Affidavit of J. Stephen Cooper
In the Criminal District Court No.3
Dallas County, Texas
DARLIE LYNN ROUTIER
No. F96-39973-MJ IN THE CRIMINAL
DISTRICT COURT
NO. 3 OF
DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS
FIRST
AFFIDAVIT OF J. STEPHEN COOPER
BEFORE ME,
the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared J. STEPHEN COOPER,
who, being by me duly sworn on his oath, stated the following:
"My
name is J. Stephen Cooper and I am competent to make this affidavit
"I am
the attorney of record for the Appellant in the case styled Darlie Lynn Routier
V. The State of Texas under case under 72,795 now pending in the Court of
Criminal Appeals. The trial court was the Criminal District Court No. 3 of
Dallas County, Texas, Case No. F96-39973-J.
"In
1998, the trial court verbally ordered the attorneys for Appellant and the
State not to contact or speak with Susan Simmons regarding her work in
attempting to prepare a new reporter's record after the inaccuracy of the
original reporter's record had become apparent.
"Subsequent
to this order, a series of hearings were conducted in which the trial court
also prohibited me from questioning Ms. Simmons directly but rather I, as well
as the State, were limited to submitting in writing proposed questions which
the trial court alone would ask of the witness Simmons.
"This
order remained in force until June 30, 2000, when the Court authorized the
parties to interview Ms. Simmons.
"Following
the filing on March 2, 2000 of (1) Defendant-Appellant's Objections To The
Proposed New Reporter's Record and (2) Defendant-Appellant's Request For A
Evidentiary Hearing To Resolve All The Factual Disputes About The Reporter's
Record, an in-chambers, off-the-record conference was held on June 23, 2000,
with the Court, me, and counsel for the State. During this conference, I asked
the Court for permission to interview Susan Simmons in preparation for an
anticipated hearing on Appellant's above pleadings and the Court denied my
request.
'At this
conference the Court further directed Appellant to submit in writing the
questions Appellant proposed for Simmons in any further hearing(s) on the
attempted reconstruction of the reporter's record in this cause. The Court
again advised that it would be asking all questions of Simmons rather than the
parties at any such hearing(s).
"Appellant
had already submitted in her pleadings filed March 2, 2000, her proposed issues
and questions to be answered at any hearing
'0n June 30,
2000, I filed a Motion To Permit Appellant To Interview Susan Simmons, the
ori~ginal of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. After filing it with the
clerk and dropping off a copy with the judge, I drove straight back to my
office and Kerry Young, the judges' chief staff attorney was calling when I
walked in the door. He said the judge was going to grant my motion but the
Court wanted me back down to court to withdraw the motion. I went back to the
Court's chambers and was told I could interview Ms. Simmons. The Court then
handed me the original file-marked copy to me across his desk and said take
this with you. On July 12, 2000, I went to Tyler, Texas and, along with
Appellant's writ counsel, Steven Losch, and another attorney, Eric Albritton
(who was assisting Mr. Losch), interviewed Ms. Simmons. Attached hereto as
Exhibit 2 and incorporated by reference is, in affidavit form prepared for Ms.
Simmons' signature, a true and accurate summary of Ms. Simmons' statements
during the afternoon of July 12, 2000. Ms. Simmons advised me today that while
she is willing to testify in court in this matter, she didn't feel it was
appropriate as the 'Court's expert1 to sign any affidavit without the Court's
permission.
"On
July 14, 2000, another in-chambers, off-the-record conference was held with the
Court, me, and counsel for the State. The purpose of this conference was,
according to the Court, for me to advise the Court what Ms. Simmons may have
said which I felt would require a new hearing. i revealed many of the things
which she had said which either conflicted with, or clarified, some of her
prior testimony. After some time, both the Court and Lindsay Roberts, assistant
district attorney, agreed that a new hearing was necessary to clarify Ms.
Simmons' testimony both in this Court and before the court reporter
certification board where Simmons had also testified on the subject of this
record.
This hearing
was eventually scheduled for September 7, 2000. Sometime after 4:00 p.m., a
member of the news media called me and said he had been told by court personnel
that the hearing had been cancelled, a fact which I subsequently confirmed with
the court administrator."
[signed]
______________________
J. Stephen
Cooper
SUBSCRIBED
AND SWORN to before me on this the 12th day of July, 2002
[signed]
____________________
Notary
Public, State of Texas